SZD/ 02
中文
SZD/ 02 PROJECTS
中文

Research index

Course Project / Medical Image Segmentation

HBA-VAN: Hierarchical Boundary-Aware Volumetric Attention Network for Multi-Modal Glioma Subregion Segmentation

Boundary-aware 3D attention network for multi-modal BraTS glioma subregion segmentation.

BME1312 Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging · Course Project · ShanghaiTech University · 2026

  • BME1312
  • Medical Imaging
  • Brain Tumor Segmentation
  • 3D U-Net
  • Attention
  • BraTS
  • WT / TC / ET
HBA-VAN architecture for multi-modal glioma MRI segmentation.
HBA-VAN for Glioma MRI Segmentation

BME1312

Overview

This project addresses automatic glioma subregion segmentation from co-registered multi-modal brain MRI. The goal is to predict three clinically meaningful and anatomically nested target regions: whole tumor (WT), tumor core (TC), and enhancing tumor (ET). The portfolio page presents the work as a staged modeling study from 2D slice-wise segmentation to full 3D volumetric reasoning.

Summary

  • T1, T1ce, T2, and FLAIR provide complementary signals for tumor extent, core structure, and enhancement.
  • WT, TC, and ET form a nested multi-label hierarchy rather than mutually exclusive semantic classes.
  • ET is usually small and sparse, producing severe class imbalance and unstable case-level Dice.
  • Tumor boundaries are ambiguous, so HD95 and error maps are important alongside overlap metrics.
WTWhole Tumor

broad abnormal tumor extent

TCTumor Core

compact core and boundary-sensitive region

ETEnhancing Tumor

small contrast-dependent enhancing component

Method

The method is organized as a progressive pipeline. Each stage keeps the same WT / TC / ET multi-label task while increasing the amount of through-plane spatial evidence available to the model.

Pipeline

Data preprocessing

  • Load co-registered NIfTI volumes for each patient.
  • Stack T1, T1ce, T2, and FLAIR as four MRI input channels.
  • Crop nonzero brain foreground to reduce redundant background.
  • Apply per-modality z-score normalization within brain voxels.
  • Construct WT / TC / ET multi-label masks from BraTS-style labels.
  • Use patient-level train / validation / test splits to avoid slice leakage.

Pipeline

Task2 baseline

  • Train a 2D U-Net for slice-wise segmentation.
  • Use one axial slice with four MRI modalities as input.
  • Predict independent sigmoid masks for WT, TC, and ET.
  • Use the 2D model as a strong reference rather than a weak baseline.

Pipeline

Task3 progression

  • Introduce 2.5D U-Net variants that use adjacent axial slices as local context.
  • Evaluate whether neighboring slices help disambiguate TC and ET boundaries.
  • Move from shallow depth context to full 3D volumetric feature learning.

Pipeline

Final model: HBA-VAN

  • Use a 3D residual encoder-decoder for volumetric reasoning.
  • Apply attention-gated skip fusion, deep supervision, and boundary-aware auxiliary learning.
  • Add an ET-specific refinement branch for the smallest subregion.
  • Regularize predictions with the hierarchy ET ⊂ TC ⊂ WT.
  • Reconstruct full-volume predictions with sliding-window inference.

Key Results

The final 3D HBA-VAN model improves both region overlap and boundary-sensitive evaluation. Compared with the 2D U-Net baseline, mean Dice increases from 0.8962 to 0.9167, while mean HD95 decreases from 6.6879 to 2.8165.

MethodSpatial ModelingWTTCETMean DiceHD95
Task2 U-Net2D0.92530.90900.85440.89626.6879
Best 2.5D2.5D0.93810.92240.86670.90914.0447
HBA-VAN3D0.94030.91440.89540.91672.8165
Mean Dice0.8962 → 0.9167

2D U-Net to HBA-VAN

HD956.6879 → 2.8165

lower boundary error

ET Dice0.8544 → 0.8954

small enhancing tumor gain

Spatial model2D → 2.5D → 3D

progressive context

Result

  • Mean Dice improves from 0.8962 for the 2D U-Net baseline to 0.9167 for HBA-VAN.
  • Mean HD95 decreases from 6.6879 to 2.8165, indicating substantially better boundary localization.
  • ET Dice improves from 0.8544 in Task2 U-Net to 0.8954 in HBA-VAN.
  • The 2.5D model confirms the value of local inter-slice context, while full 3D modeling provides the best overall result.

Visuals

The figures below are cropped and web-optimized from the report and presentation materials, focusing on the actual diagrams and qualitative results rather than full-page screenshots.

My Contribution

  • Contributed to the final project report and presentation material organization.
  • Participated in result interpretation and qualitative analysis.
  • Helped summarize the model design, experimental findings, and medical-imaging motivation.
  • Integrated the project into a reproducible academic portfolio format.